After a period of dormancy, DeFi is poised for a revival, as discussed by panelists who explored its future role in the crypto landscape. Notable figures such as Kain Warwick, Stani Kulechov, and Sam Kazemian shared insights on the evolution of DeFi, the potential for new innovations, and the transition from experimentation to consolidation, alongside the next steps for scaling and competing with centralized services.

Insights on DeFi Evolution

Moderator David Hoffman opened the session by noting the lack of significant evolution since the post-DeFi summer boom. Kain Warwick, founder of Synthetix and a pioneer of yield farming, suggested that future innovations in DeFi will likely arise from the integration of new technologies.

• Warwick emphasized the importance of combining elements to create something new, pointing out that Synthetix’s spin-off, Infinex, was developed to incorporate advanced features that enhance user experience and broaden technology distribution.
• He believes that the DeFi market still holds vast potential, especially for users currently reliant on centralized platforms.

Maturity and Profitability in DeFi

Stani Kulechov highlighted the shift from experimentation to profitability as a sign of maturity within DeFi protocols, with certain decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) leading this transition.

• He stated that the next growth phase for DeFi will focus on building trust, establishing network effects, and enhancing brand value, positioning DeFi as a credible alternative to centralized exchanges.
• Kulechov noted that centralized lending has already seen significant replacement by non-custodial options.

Decentralized Chains and Interoperability

Sam Kazemian praised the increasing number of decentralized chains, referencing Uniswap’s recent launch of Unichain as validation of Frax’s earlier decision to establish its own chain, Fraxtal.

• Kazemian envisions a future where decentralized chains handle most computational tasks, further blurring the lines between centralized and decentralized services, thereby enhancing interoperability.

The panel also observed a trend of centralized exchanges either launching their own chains or forming close affiliations with them, with varying degrees of decentralization. Notable examples include Binance with BNB Chain and Coinbase with Base.

Challenges and Opportunities for DeFi

Kazemian pointed out that exchanges were among the first solutions for cross-chain interoperability. However, Warwick noted that DeFi has traditionally catered to a niche audience of enthusiasts, which has hindered broader adoption.

• He stressed the need to simplify user experiences and broaden market access to break through the barriers of mainstream adoption.

The Shift in Perspective on Chains

Blockworks co-founder Michael Ippolito questioned the weaknesses of centralized services, suggesting that Unichain exemplifies a trend toward vertical integration in DeFi, moving away from previous dapp development perspectives.

• Warwick acknowledged this trend, even if it comes at the expense of some censorship resistance, stating that without addressing internal challenges, DeFi cannot credibly position itself against traditional banking systems.

Kazemian concluded that the narrative has shifted from questioning the necessity of chains to understanding their essential role in the future of finance.

Stay Informed with Crypto Insights

• Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross by subscribing to the Empire newsletter.
• Explore the intersection of crypto, macroeconomics, policy, and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner, and Felix Jauvin by subscribing to the Forward Guidance newsletter.
• Get market highlights, charts, trade ideas, and governance updates with the 0xResearch newsletter.
• For all things Solana, subscribe to the Lightspeed newsletter for daily updates.

In the realm of blockchain networks, a high-throughput sequencer functions like a multi-lane highway, enabling a greater volume of data and operations to flow without congestion. This capability is crucial for applications such as on-chain games, decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, and social applications that require swift processing of numerous transactions.

The Importance of Sequencer Throughput

• Impact on Scalability: The throughput of a sequencer dictates the computational workload a blockchain can handle over time, directly affecting the scalability and efficiency of decentralized applications (dapps).
• Managing User Activity: Enhanced throughput enables networks to accommodate spikes in user engagement and support complex, resource-intensive applications.

Conduit's G2 Sequencer Launch

Today, Conduit unveiled a significant 10x enhancement in throughput with the introduction of G2, touted as the world's most powerful sequencer. G2 is designed to handle a computational load ranging from 50 to 100 million gas per second (Mgas/s).

Technological Advancements Behind G2

According to Andrew Huang, the founder of Conduit, the G2 sequencer is a product of multiple technological enhancements, including:

• Deep database optimizations
• Improvements in algorithmic efficiency

Huang explained, “There’s no single breakthrough, but rather a series of incremental optimizations — a 5% gain here, a 10% gain there, and over time, it compounds.” These enhancements affect all layers of the system, from data access and storage to the cloud-native infrastructure.

Overcoming Scaling Challenges

Under heavy loads, sequencers often struggle to keep pace with the blockchain's demands. The G2's capacity facilitates the execution of applications that were previously unfeasible to run entirely on-chain, such as Web3 games. A notable example is Pirate Nation, which initially launched on the Polygon PoS chain before transitioning to the Arbitrum Orbit tech stack.

The Need for Scalable Solutions

As the platform expanded, it required a more scalable and cost-effective solution, leading to the development of the Orbit chains. The Proof of Play team emphasizes that the activity on these chains reflects genuine user engagement, with measures in place to prevent bot activity.

The Future of Gaming and G2

With G2, the team has successfully tackled scaling challenges, allowing for additional chains to be integrated as necessary. Huang noted that gaming applications are particularly demanding, but G2 has also enabled Gravity, a Web2 app, to migrate its database of 26 million active users on-chain.

Mgas/s: A New Metric for Scalability

The industry is shifting from the traditional transactions per second (TPS) metric to measuring throughput in Mgas/s. Huang criticized TPS as an inadequate measure, stating, “TPS is a dead metric; it tells you nothing about how much compute is actually happening on-chain.”

The Advantages of Mgas/s

• Comprehensive Performance Measurement: Mgas/s offers a clearer understanding of rollup performance by encompassing various workloads, including compute and storage.
• Future Aspirations: The G2 team aims to reach gigagas throughput levels, targeting 1000 Mgas/s. This goal aligns with the ambitions of Base, an Ethereum layer-2 rollup, which is also working to enhance its throughput.

The transition towards gigagas throughput is expected to unlock new possibilities for more computationally intensive decentralized applications, including social networks, prediction markets, and high-frequency trading systems that demand substantial performance capabilities.

Maker is contemplating a potential rebranding strategy just two months after its transition to the name "Sky." Initially announced in late August and implemented on September 24, the rebrand aimed to facilitate the conversion of the original MKR governance token to the new SKY governance token at a rate of 1-to-24,000.

Conversion Rates and Market Performance

Since the rebranding, only 10.7% of MKR token holders have made the switch to the SKY governance token. In contrast, the USDS stablecoin has experienced a more favorable reception, achieving a market cap of $1.26 billion.

Community Sentiment and Governance Options

Rune Christensen, co-founder of Maker, highlighted the community's strong attachment to the Maker brand, noting that many holders prefer to retain their MKR tokens rather than upgrade to SKY. On October 28, the Maker team will present three options for governance votes:

1. Maintain "Sky" as the core brand.
2. Completely revert to the original Maker brand identity.
3. Revert to the original branding with minor updates to align with USDS and StarDAOs.

Psychological Factors in Token Value

The redenomination from MKR to SKY was intended to leverage "unit bias," where a lower price per token might attract more retail investors. However, Christensen admitted that this strategy did not yield the expected results, particularly as the SKY token failed to be listed on centralized exchanges.

Incentives and Criticism

To encourage conversion to SKY, incentives such as "seal rewards" and "activation rewards" were proposed for stakers. However, Christensen acknowledged that these features have become complicated amid numerous new developments based on community feedback. Critics have pointed out the significant expenditure of $50 million on the rebranding, to which Christensen responded that the funds were not solely for rebranding but aimed at boosting demand for the USDS stablecoin.

Future Developments

Since the rebranding to Sky, the Maker team has launched several high-profile initiatives, including the integration of USDS with Aave and the introduction of USDS to Solana and other Ethereum Layer 2 solutions.